The Resolution Law Group: Federal authorities to prosecute JP Morgan Chase employees who allegedly disguised losses on a trade.

Federal authorities announced that they are going to criminally prosecute against two former JP Morgan Chase employees who allegedly disguised losses on a trade that spun out of control last year.

The former JP Morgan employees – Javier Martin-Artajo, a manager who oversaw the trading strategy and Julien Grout, a low level trader in London – were charged with wire fraud, falsifying bank records, and contributing to false regulatory records. The government also charged them with conspiracy to commit those crimes.

Geoffrey Broderick, the senior partner of the Resolution Law Group, says “while this criminal prosecution is a step in the right direction, the allegations, if true, are systematic and rampant in nature. Why isn’t the government pursuing criminal charges against the executives at JP Morgan Chase and those who committed the criminal acts?” Broderick added, “it is unlikely that the low level trader in London was acting on his own initiative. If there was a conspiracy, the ringleaders were a big part of it.”

Mr. Broderick adds that “The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature. Somebody has to fix the problem. That is why The Resolution Law Group continues its fight for homeowners. Homeowners cannot expect the problem to fix itself.”

The Resolution Law Group continues to prosecute ground breaking litigation in Federal Court on behalf of homeowners suing lenders and servicers for, among other things, the illegal use of MERS, robo-signing, and intentionally ignoring underwriting standards and encouraging inflated appraisals.

The Resolution Law Group is currently enrolling clients into the pending lawsuit. For further information, visit its website at www.TheResolutionLawGroup.com

The Resolution Law Group: DOJ claims BofA knew more than 40% of the mortgages it bundled into securities did not meet underwriting guidelines and sold them anyway.

The Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission have sued Bank of America, alleging that traders at Bank of America willfully mislead investors about the quality of the residential mortgages tucked into the securities the banks sold at the start of the financial crisis.

Now, Bank of America faces civil charges for allegedly hiding the risks associated with $850 million worth of securities backed by home loans. The DOJ claims the bank knew that more than 40% of the mortgages it bundled into securities did not meet underwriting guidelines and sold them anyway.

Geoffrey Broderick, the senior partner of the Resolution Law Group, says “while the civil lawsuit is a step in the right direction, the allegations, if true, are criminal in nature. Why isn’t the government pursuing criminal charges against the banks and those who committed the criminal acts?“

Mr. Broderick adds that “The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature. Somebody has to fix the problem. That is why The Resolution Law Group continues its fight for homeowners. Homeowners cannot expect the problem to fix itself.”

The Resolution Law Group continues to prosecute ground breaking litigation in Federal Court on behalf of homeowners suing lenders and servicers for, among other things, the illegal use of MERS, robo-signing, and intentionally ignoring underwriting standards and encouraging inflated appraisals.

The Resolution Law Group is currently enrolling clients into the pending lawsuit. For further information, visit its website at www.TheResolutionLawGroup.com

The Resolution Law Group: Citigroup Must Pay $11M Claimant for Royal Bank of Scotland Investment Losses, Says FINRA Arbitration Panel

A FINRA arbitration panel has decided that Citigroup (C) and Edward J. Mulcahy, one of the firm’s ex-branch managers, has to pay $11 million to investor John Fiorilla. Fiorilla is a legal adviser to the Holy See who went to Citigroup because he wanted to de-risk a $16 million stock position in Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).

According to the claimant, he asked Citigroup to employ derivatives to assist in hedging his position against losses but the firm did not fulfill the request. When the market failed in 2008 his account suffered over $15 million in losses.

Fiorilla is claiming breach of contract, failure to control and supervise, breach of fiduciary duty, gross negligence, negligence, and other violations. His claim against Mulcahy is over an alleged failure to supervise.

The FINRA arbitration panel says Citigroup has to pay $10,750,000 and 9% interest from 5/1/09 until full payment of the award is reached. Mulcahy, who retired from Citigroup recently, must pay $250,000 and interest.

Citigroup denies the securities fraud allegations and is disappointed with the arbitration ruling.

Arbitration
Arbitration is one venue through which securities disputes between parties are resolved. To be eligible to be heard before a FINRA panel, cases must involve a FINRA-registered individual or entity and an investor (including broker v. investor, broker-dealer v. investor, brokerage firm and stockbrokers v. investors) or multiple FINRA-registered entities and/or individuals (such as broker v. broker, broker v. brokerage firm). Claims need to be submitted within six years that the events leading to the dispute happened.

Investors have to arbitrate before FINRA if this is mandated in their written agreement together, the dispute is with a FINRA member, and involves that member’s securities business. Industry members must arbitrate their disputes with each other before FINRA if a brokerage firm/broker’s securities business activities are involved. Brokerage firms and brokers have to enter into FINRA arbitration if the investor requests it.

The best way to increase the chances your FINRA securities case will come out in your favor is to hire an experienced FINRA arbitration lawyer.

We have helped thousands of clients recoup their losses sustained due to the negligence or errors of their financial representatives.  Please do not hesitate to email or call the The Resolution Law Group (203) 542-7275 for a confidential, no obligation consultation.

Lender Litigation, Unlawful Foreclosure, Tarp Money, Mortgage Backed Securities, Derivitives Lawsuits, Insider Trading Lawsuit, SEC Settlements, Ponzi Scheme Lawsuits, Intentional Misrepresentation, Securitized Mortgage, Class Action Securities Lawsuit, Robo-Signing Lawsuit, Lost Equity Litigation, Mortgage Lender Fraud, FINRA Fraud Lawsuit, Suing Banks, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Short Sale Fraud, Fraudulent Business Practices, Mortgage Litigation, Complex Tort Litigation, Injunctive Relief, MERS Fraud

The Resolution Law Group: Closing Agent Admits Participating in Large-Scale Mortgage Fraud Scheme

NEWARK, NJ—A paralegal today admitted participating in a long-running, large-scale mortgage fraud scheme that defrauded financial institutions of at least $2 million, United States Attorney Paul J Fishman announced. Linda Cohen, 55, of Orange, New Jersey, pleaded guilty before United States District Judge Esther Salas to an information charging her with one count of conspiring to commit bank fraud and one count of transacting in criminal proceeds. According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court: Cohen worked as a paralegal who handled real estate closing for SB ., an attorney licensed in New Jersey. Cohen acted as the settlement agent for fraudulent mortgage loans brokered by conspirator Klary Arcentales, 45, of Lyndhurst, New Jersey, on behalf of Premier Mortgage Services.

As closing agent, Cohen furthered the scheme by convening closings, receiving funds from lenders, and preparing HUD-1 reports that purported to reflect the sources and destinations of funds for mortgages on subject properties. Those HUD-1s were neither true nor accurate. Cohen routinely certified HUD-1s in which she purported to have received a down payment from the buyer when no down payment had been made. At or following the closings, Cohen disbursed mortgage loan proceeds directly to Premier Mortgage Services, Arcentales, and other conspirators.

Cohen created shell bank accounts into which she funneled the proceeds of her fraudulent activity. The count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud to which Cohen pleaded guilty is punishable by a maximum potential penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine, and the count of transacting in criminal proceeds is punishable by a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross amount of any gain or loss. Sentencing is scheduled for November 18, 2013. United States Attorney Fishman credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Aaron T Ford; and special agents of IRS-Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Shantelle P Kitchen, for the investigation leading to today’s guilty plea.

He also thanked the Social Security Administration-Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Edward Ryan, for its role in the investigation. The government is represented by Assistant United States Attorneys Zach Intrater and Rahul Agarwal of the Newark office. This case was brought in coordination with President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. The task force was established to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.

The Resolution Law Group: West Hartford Lawyer Charged In Mortgage Fraud Scheme

A West Hartford lawyer who took part in a $3.5 million mortgage fraud scheme has pleaded guilty to federal charges, according to federal prosecutors.

Gabriel R. “Gabe” Serrano, 47, plead guilty August 6 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez in Hartford to one count of conspiracy to commit mail and bank fraud, a charge that carries a maximum prison term of 30 years, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, a charge that carries a sentence of up to 10 years behind bars.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Connecticut, from June 2005 to at least November 2008, Serrano was involved in a conspiracy that involved straw borrowers, false mortgage applications, false Housing and Urban Development forms, fraudulent down payments, and false verification forms for the purchase of numerous houses in Hartford, New Haven, and Middlesex counties.

Prosecutors say Serrano served as the closing attorney on at least 24 fraudulent transactions. Specifically, he is alleged to have served as the closing attorney when a co-conspirator purchased properties with financing from private lenders. Later, when the co-conspirator sold many of the properties, Serrano usually represented the buyer. Authorities said that Serrano knew that his accomplice, and not the buyer, had provided the down payment money. In this way, contrary to what Serrano led mortgage lenders to believe, the buyers were purchasing properties with no down payment funds of their own.

In addition, some borrowers purchased multiple properties from Serrano’s co-conspirator and represented to mortgage lenders that they were purchasing each home as their primary residence. Serrano reportedly knew that the borrowers did not intend to use the properties as primary residences.

In the course of many of the fraudulent closings, Serrano received mortgage proceeds from banks and mortgage lenders. Serrano would frequently disburse some of those proceeds to private parties who had loaned his co-conspirator money to purchase those properties.

Serrano is an attorney at the West Hartford firm of Serrano & Serrano, which he started in 1993 with his older brother, John. The firm also has a Waterbury location. According to a statement released by the firm, Gabe Serrano’s role in the scheme involved two dozen real estate closings related to a single client.

“Over the past 20 years, Gabe has provided legal services to hundreds of clients on thousands of cases,” read the statement. “Gabe deeply regrets the poor judgment shown through his actions and, as reflected through his timely guilty plea, accepts full and complete responsibility for his involvement in the matter.”

The statement said John Serrano has assumed primary responsibility for all of the firm’s cases.

Gabe Serrano received his law degree from Hofstra University in 1991. He had managed the firm’s real estate department.

A West Hartford lawyer who took part in a $3.5 million mortgage fraud scheme has pleaded guilty to federal charges, according to federal prosecutors.

Gabriel R. “Gabe” Serrano, 47, pled guilty August 6 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez in Hartford to one count of conspiracy to commit mail and bank fraud, a charge that carries a maximum prison term of 30 years, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, a charge that carries a sentence of up to 10 years behind bars.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Connecticut, from June 2005 to at least November 2008, Serrano was involved in a conspiracy that involved straw borrowers, false mortgage applications, false Housing and Urban Development forms, fraudulent down payments, and false verification forms for the purchase of numerous houses in Hartford, New Haven, and Middlesex counties.

Prosecutors say Serrano served as the closing attorney on at least 24 fraudulent transactions. Specifically, he is alleged to have served as the closing attorney when a co-conspirator purchased properties with financing from private lenders. Later, when the co-conspirator sold many of the properties, Serrano usually represented the buyer. Authorities said that Serrano knew that his accomplice, and not the buyer, had provided the down payment money. In this way, contrary to what Serrano led mortgage lenders to believe, the buyers were purchasing properties with no down payment funds of their own.

In addition, some borrowers purchased multiple properties from Serrano’s co-conspirator and represented to mortgage lenders that they were purchasing each home as their primary residence. Serrano reportedly knew that the borrowers did not intend to use the properties as primary residences.

In the course of many of the fraudulent closings, Serrano received mortgage proceeds from banks and mortgage lenders. Serrano would frequently disburse some of those proceeds to private parties who had loaned his co-conspirator money to purchase those properties.

Serrano is an attorney at the West Hartford firm of Serrano & Serrano, which he started in 1993 with his older brother, John. The firm also has a Waterbury location. According to a statement released by the firm, Gabe Serrano’s role in the scheme involved two dozen real estate closings related to a single client.

“Over the past 20 years, Gabe has provided legal services to hundreds of clients on thousands of cases,” read the statement. “Gabe deeply regrets the poor judgment shown through his actions and, as reflected through his timely guilty plea, accepts full and complete responsibility for his involvement in the matter.”

The statement said John Serrano has assumed primary responsibility for all of the firm’s cases.

Gabe Serrano received his law degree from Hofstra University in 1991. He had managed the firm’s real estate department.

The Resolution Law Group: JP Morgan to face criminal and civil investigations over mortgages

The investigations come amid a battery of other probes into the banking giant’s business from federal and state regulators

JP Morgan has disclosed it faces criminal and civil investigations into the sale of mortgage-backed securities ahead of the financial crisis.

The bank faces parallel investigations by the civil and criminal divisions of the US attorney’s office for the eastern district of California, according to a regulatory filing made late Wednesday. The attorney’s civil division has already “preliminarily concluded” that the bank broke civil securities laws in selling the securities between 2005 to 2007, according to the filing.

JP Morgan also disclosed that it has received requests concerning mortgage securities from the US attorney for Connecticut, the Securities and Exchange Commission‘s (SEC) enforcement division and the inspector general for the government’s bank bailout programme relating to “among other matters, communications with counterparties in connection with certain mortgage-backed securities transactions.”

The investigations come amid a battery of other probes into the banking giant’s business from federal and state regulators. The bank also faces class action lawsuits over its $6bn losses related to the so-called “London whale” trader.

JP Morgan is not alone in facing ongoing investigations into the sale of mortgage securities. The bank’s disclosure comes in the same week that the justice department and the SEC filed separate suits charging Bank of America of understating the risks associated with the sale of $850m of mortgage-backed securities in 2008.

According to the SEC, Bank of America’s then-CEO had described the type of assets for sale as “toxic waste” and failed to inform investors about their “vastly greater risks of severe delinquencies, early defaults, underwriting defects, and prepayment.”

On the same day UBS agreed to pay $50m to the SEC to settle charges that it violated securities laws while structuring and marketing a mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligation (CDO) by failing to disclose that it retained millions of dollars that should have gone to investors.

Announcing the action against Bank of America attorney general Eric Holder said the financial fraud enforcement task force, set up by president barack Obama, was pursuing “a range of additional investigations.”

Holder said the justice department “will continue to take an aggressive approach to combating financial fraud and uncovering abuses in the residential mortgage-backed securities market.”

If you feel you are the victim of Mortgage Fraud, please do not hesitate to email or call the The Resolution Law Group (203) 542-7275 for a confidential, no obligation consultation.

Lender Litigation, Unlawful Foreclosure, Tarp Money, Mortgage Backed Securities, Derivitives Lawsuits, Insider Trading Lawsuit, SEC Settlements, Ponzi Scheme Lawsuits, Intentional Misrepresentation, Securitized Mortgage, Class Action Securities Lawsuit, Robo-Signing Lawsuit, Lost Equity Litigation, Mortgage Lender Fraud, FINRA Fraud Lawsuit, Suing Banks, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Short Sale Fraud, Fraudulent Business Practices, Mortgage Litigation, Complex Tort Litigation, Injunctive Relief, MERS Fraud

The Resolution Law Group: Richmond is about to become the first city in the nation to try eminent domain as a way to stop foreclosures.

The power of eminent domain has traditionally worked against homeowners, who can be forced to sell their property to make way for a new highway or shopping mall. But now the working-class city of Richmond, Calif., hopes to use the same legal tool to help people stay right where they are.

Scarcely touched by the nation’s housing recovery and tired of waiting for federal help, Richmond is about to become the first city in the nation to try eminent domain as a way to stop foreclosures.

The results will be closely watched by both Wall Street banks, which have vigorously opposed the use of eminent domain to buy mortgages and reduce homeowner debt, and a host of cities across the country that are considering emulating Richmond.

Geoffrey Broderick, the senior partner of the Resolution Law Group, says “while the City of Richmond’s exercise of eminent domain is a step in the right direction, the banks and their lobbyists and politicians will not back down without a fight. “

We’re not willing to back down on this,” said Gayle McLaughlin, the former schoolteacher who is serving her second term as Richmond’s mayor. “They can put forward as much pressure as they would like, but I’m very committed to this program, and I’m very committed to the well-being of our neighborhoods.”

Many cities, particularly those where minority residents were steered into predatory loans, face a situation similar to that in Richmond, which is largely black and Hispanic. About two dozen other local and state governments, including Newark, Seattle, and a handful of cities in California, are looking at the eminent domain strategy, according to a count by Robert Hockett, a Cornell University law professor and one of the plan’s chief proponents. Irvington, N.J., passed a resolution supporting its use in July. North Las Vegas will consider an eminent domain proposal in August, and El Monte, Calif., is poised to act after hearing out the opposition this week.

The banks and the real estate industry have argued that such a move would be unprecedented and unconstitutional. But not all mortgage investors oppose the plan. Some have long argued that writing down homeowner debt makes sense in many cases. “This is not the first choice, but it’s rapidly becoming the only choice on how to fix this mess,” said William Frey, an investor advocate.

Mr. Frey said that the big banks were terrified that if eminent domain strategies became widespread, they would engulf not only primary mortgages but some $450 billion in second liens and home equity loans that are on the banks’ balance sheets. “It has nothing to do with morality or anything like that, it has to do with second liens.”

When asked, Mr. Broderick stated that “The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature. Somebody has to fix the problem. That is why The Resolution Law Group continues its fight for homeowners. Homeowners cannot expect the problem to fix itself.”

The Resolution Law Group continues to prosecute ground breaking litigation in Federal Court on behalf of homeowners suing lenders and servicers for, among other things, the illegal use of MERS, robo-signing, and intentionally ignoring underwriting standards and encouraging inflated appraisals.

The Resolution Law Group is currently enrolling clients into the pending lawsuit. For further information, visit its website at www.TheResolutionLawGroup.com

Lender Litigation, Unlawful Foreclosure, Tarp Money, Mortgage Backed Securities, Derivitives Lawsuits, Insider Trading Lawsuit, SEC Settlements, Ponzi Scheme Lawsuits, Intentional Misrepresentation, Securitized Mortgage, Class Action Securities Lawsuit, Robo-Signing Lawsuit, Lost Equity Litigation, Mortgage Lender Fraud, FINRA Fraud Lawsuit, Suing Banks, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Short Sale Fraud, Fraudulent Business Practices, Mortgage Litigation, Complex Tort Litigation, Injunctive Relief, MERS Fraud

The Resolution Law Group: Rust Consulting sent out checks that bounced for insufficient funds to homeowners as settlement

Three weeks after Rust Consulting sent out checks that bounced for insufficient funds to homeowners as settlement proceeds from the massive settlement reached between the banks and Attorneys General, Rust issued nearly 100,000 checks for less than the homeowners were owed.

Geoffrey Broderick, the senior partner of the Resolution Law Group, says “At least the second round of checks cleared. However, there is no excuse for Rust Consulting to issue bounced checks or for paying incorrect amounts of money. There should be sufficient funds out of the multi-billion settlement to ensure that the payments are made timely and in the proper amounts. “

Mr. Broderick adds that “The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature. Somebody has to fix the problem. That is why The Resolution Law Group continues its fight for homeowners. Homeowners cannot expect the problem to fix itself.”

The Resolution Law Group continues to prosecute ground breaking litigation in Federal Court on behalf of homeowners suing lenders and servicers for, among other things, the illegal use of MERS, robo-signing, and intentionally ignoring underwriting standards and encouraging inflated appraisals.

The Resolution Law Group is currently enrolling clients into the pending lawsuit. For further information, visit its website at www.TheResolutionLawGroup.com

If you feel you are the victim of Mortgage Fraud, please do not hesitate to email or call the The Resolution Law Group (203) 542-7275 for a confidential, no obligation consultation.

Lender Litigation, Unlawful Foreclosure, Tarp Money, Mortgage Backed Securities, Derivitives Lawsuits, Insider Trading Lawsuit, SEC Settlements, Ponzi Scheme Lawsuits, Intentional Misrepresentation, Securitized Mortgage, Class Action Securities Lawsuit, Robo-Signing Lawsuit, Lost Equity Litigation, Mortgage Lender Fraud, FINRA Fraud Lawsuit, Suing Banks, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Short Sale Fraud, Fraudulent Business Practices, Mortgage Litigation, Complex Tort Litigation, Injunctive Relief, MERS Fraud

The Resolution Law Group: A Judge in Palm Beach, Florida has ordered a bank to modify a homeowner’s mortgage instead of foreclosing on it.

A Judge in Palm Beach, Florida has ordered a bank to modify a homeowner’s mortgage instead of foreclosing on it. The order has created a panic in the lending and servicing community.

Judge Howard Harrison ruled that the lender provisionally modified the loan, and the trial modification was intended to motivate the homeowner to continue making payments, despite the evidence that the lender never intended to allow a permanent modification. Judge Harrison ordered the lender to reduce the interest rate to 3.15 percent and to extend the loan to be paid over 40 years.

Geoffrey Broderick, the senior partner of the Resolution Law Group, says “while the Court’s ruling is a step in the right direction, Judge Harrison may have exceeded his authority, and the matter will certainly be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. We will be closely following the case through the appellate process. “

Mr. Broderick adds that “The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature. Somebody has to fix the problem. That is why The Resolution Law Group continues its fight for homeowners. Homeowners cannot expect the problem to fix itself.”

The Resolution Law Group continues to prosecute ground breaking litigation in Federal Court on behalf of homeowners suing lenders and servicers for, among other things, the illegal use of MERS, robo-signing, and intentionally ignoring underwriting standards and encouraging inflated appraisals.

The Resolution Law Group is currently enrolling clients into the pending lawsuit. For further information, visit its website at www.TheResolutionLawGroup.com

If you feel you are the victim of Mortgage Fraud, please do not hesitate to email or call the The Resolution Law Group (203) 542-7275 for a confidential, no obligation consultation.

Lender Litigation, Unlawful Foreclosure, Tarp Money, Mortgage Backed Securities, Derivitives Lawsuits, Insider Trading Lawsuit, SEC Settlements, Ponzi Scheme Lawsuits, Intentional Misrepresentation, Securitized Mortgage, Class Action Securities Lawsuit, Robo-Signing Lawsuit, Lost Equity Litigation, Mortgage Lender Fraud, FINRA Fraud Lawsuit, Suing Banks, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Short Sale Fraud, Fraudulent Business Practices, Mortgage Litigation, Complex Tort Litigation, Injunctive Relief, MERS Fraud

The Resolution Law Group: The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature.

When lawyers for the City of Los Angeles filed a lawsuit against Deutsche Bank two years ago, they criticized the world’s fourth-largest bank as among the city’s worst slumlord and sought hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties and restitution.

Despite the fanfare and rhetoric when the case was brought, the city of Los Angeles just announced that it settled with Deutsche Bank for only ten million dollars and that the settlement money was not going to be paid by the bank.

Geoffrey Broderick, the senior partner of the Resolution Law Group, says “Deutsche Bank foreclosed on more than 2,000 homes in metropolitan Los Angeles between 2007 and 2011. Many homes fell into disrepair and crime increased in the neighborhoods where the foreclosures took place. “

Mr. Broderick adds that “The housing market will continue to suffer until it is fixed by the Courts or the Legislature. Somebody has to fix the problem. That is why The Resolution Law Group continues its fight for homeowners. Homeowners cannot expect the problem to fix itself.”

The Resolution Law Group continues to prosecute ground breaking litigation in Federal Court on behalf of homeowners suing lenders and servicers for, among other things, the illegal use of MERS, robo-signing, and intentionally ignoring underwriting standards and encouraging inflated appraisals.

The Resolution Law Group is currently enrolling clients into the pending lawsuit. For further information, visit its website at www.TheResolutionLawGroup.com

If you feel you are the victim of Mortgage Fraud, please do not hesitate to email or call the The Resolution Law Group (203) 542-7275 for a confidential, no obligation consultation.

Lender Litigation, Unlawful Foreclosure, Tarp Money, Mortgage Backed Securities, Derivitives Lawsuits, Insider Trading Lawsuit, SEC Settlements, Ponzi Scheme Lawsuits, Intentional Misrepresentation, Securitized Mortgage, Class Action Securities Lawsuit, Robo-Signing Lawsuit, Lost Equity Litigation, Mortgage Lender Fraud, FINRA Fraud Lawsuit, Suing Banks, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Short Sale Fraud, Fraudulent Business Practices, Mortgage Litigation, Complex Tort Litigation, Injunctive Relief, MERS Fraud